If you are looking for more details, kindly visit Wing Flying.
I
Thread starter
Nick Nowaczyk
Start date
Jul 5,Tags
In summary, the faster the propeller spins, the more force it can create. The rpm of the propeller also affects the force of the airflow it releases.
Nick Nowaczyk
I was wondering how fast you would need to spin a drone propeller to lift x amount of force and mostly how the rpm of the propeller affects the force of the airflow it releases. Im incredibly new to physics in general and you can take everything I say with a grain of salt.
I have no actual device but for a hypothetical the question would be something like:
I have a fan/drone propeller that is .8m in diameter and the propeller is made of carbon fiber. How fast would it or how many at what speed would it take to release a force of N?
Again, sorry if Im going about this all wrong, Ive never taken a physics course and may have no idea what Im talking about.
Science Advisor
Award
Welcome to PF.
If you look at the blades of a propeller, you will see they have an airfoil profile like a wing. It is that wing moving through the air that lifts the drone propeller upwards, pulling the drone up by the motor mounts. The air that goes downwards is a reaction to the lift of the blade section.
The lift force will depend on the RPM and the number of blades on the propeller. It will also depend on the blade profile and the twist along the blade. That makes it complicated.
A rotor of 0.8 m diameter will have an area of 0.5 m2.
The rotor disc loading will be / 0.5 = N per square meter.
I think that is a bit high, and you may need a bigger prop or less weight. Look for specification data on a similar size drone. Find the rotor diameter and calculate the swept area. Find the total drone weight in kg, then multiply by 9.8 to get the hovering force in newtons. Divide force by area to compute a realistic rotor disc loading. Compare that with your example.
Science Advisor
Estimating the thrust just from propeller geometry and RPM is not a simple computation. One can use numerical methods, but it's much more reliable to look at the datasheets from the propeller, which are based on experimental measurements.Nick Nowaczyk said:
Estimating the thrust just from propeller geometry and RPM is not a simple computation. One can use numerical methods, but it's much more reliable to look at the datasheets from the propeller, which are based on experimental measurements.
Mentor
From the other direction, though, is fairly straightforward: force (thrust) is rate of change of momentum of the air. The propeller just accelerates a disk of air. Larger propellers mean lower velocity to generate the same force -- and less power.
Arjan82
For more thrust calculation for droneinformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.
Maybe this document helps, it's a good explainer (unfortunately imperial units...):With some good guestimates you can come a long way. But you would need some more details of the propeller, the most important ones are diameter and pitch. You've already mentioned diameter, for most propeller performance data this is also just a scaling parameter. This means you can say something about a 0.5m diameter propeller if you have data of a 1.0m diameter propeller, as long as the propellers are mostly geometrically similar.But pitch is the other important parameter, you can not scale performance data for that. I don't know what the typical pitch is for the propellers you are talking about. If you have the pitch you need to find a performance curve for a propeller roughly of similar shape but most importantly of similar pitch.The rest are 'second order' effects (I mean, based on the level of detail you are asking for). Yes, the number of blades is overrated, it hasn't got that much of an influence on the performance... (the difference between 2 and 3 bladed propeller is largest, and diminishes rapidly after that, but by large I mean <10% thrust difference at equal RPM or so)
Science Advisor
The OP sounds like it's about a copter-drone. Static propeller thrust is more relevant while hovering than cruising efficiency for fixed wing aircraft propellers.Arjan82 said:
https://nar-associates.com/technical-flying/propeller/cruise_propeller_efficiency_screen.pdfMaybe this document helps, it's a good explainer (unfortunately imperial units...):
The OP sounds like it's about a copter-drone. Static propeller thrust is more relevant while hovering than cruising efficiency for fixed wing aircraft propellers.
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Welcome, Nick!Nick Nowaczyk said:
Welcome, Nick!The pitch of the propeller is important as well.Please, see:
Thrust is generated by a drone propeller through the process of converting rotational motion into linear force. As the propeller spins, it moves air downwards, creating a difference in air pressure above and below the propeller blades. This pressure difference produces an upward force known as thrust, which lifts the drone.
The amount of thrust a drone propeller can generate is influenced by several factors, including the propeller's diameter, pitch, shape, material, and rotational speed (RPM). Larger diameters and higher pitches generally produce more thrust. Additionally, the efficiency of the motor and the density of the air (affected by altitude and temperature) also play significant roles.
To measure the thrust of a drone propeller, you can use a thrust stand or test rig. This device typically consists of a mounting point for the motor and propeller, as well as sensors to measure the force produced. By running the motor at various speeds and recording the thrust readings, you can determine the performance characteristics of the propeller.
Generally, larger propellers can generate more thrust because they move a greater volume of air with each rotation. However, they also require more power to spin and can create more drag. The pitch of the propeller blades also plays a crucial role; higher pitch blades move more air per rotation, increasing thrust but also demanding more power.
Yes, changing the propeller can significantly improve your drone's performance. By selecting propellers with the appropriate size, pitch, and material for your specific drone and its intended use, you can optimize thrust, efficiency, and stability. It's important to balance the propeller's characteristics with the capabilities of the drone's motors and the overall design to achieve the best performance.
Ill be honest: I love my drone. I mean, I always had remote-control vehicles back when I was a teenager. And of course the most impressive RC vehicle was the gas-powered helicopter. But it was expensive and hard to fly. Now, with a quadcopter, it's a breeze. On top of that, it takes pictures and videos.
Since I have this fascination with drones, it's only logical to take the next step and use it for some physics. How about an analysis of the aeronautics of this particular drone, the DJI Spark. Drones, physicswhat could be better?
So I used my to record some slow-motion videos of the Spark moving first vertically and then horizontally. Here's an example below. And then I used one of my favorite tools, the Tracker video-analysis app, to plot the position of the drone in each frame. Armed with that data, it's just a hop, skip, and a jump to derive performance specs like acceleration and thrust.
On the Ball
The video essentially gives me a series of time-stamped snapshots of the drone as it moves, but I need to know the frame rate to calibrate the time scale. My says it records slo-mo at 240 frames per secondor, in other words, at 4.17 millisecond intervals.
Just to double-check that, Im going to run a test analysis on something I already know about: the acceleration of a ball tossed straight up into the air. An object in free fall, where gravity is the only force working on it, has a vertical acceleration of about 9.81 meters/second2.
So if I put a meter stick in the video frame (its that horizontal stick next to my hand), I will know both the distance scale and the vertical acceleration. From that, I can figure out the true frame rate. Here's what the ball toss looks like:
I ran the Tracker software on this clip and adjusted the listed frame rate until the fitting equation gives me a vertical acceleration of 9.81 m/s2. After playing around a bit, I got a time interval of 4.28 millisecondsso actually about 234 frames per second. Here is the trajectory with the adjusted frame rate:
The company is the world’s best drone quality testing supplier. We are your one-stop shop for all needs. Our staff are highly-specialized and will help you find the product you need.