I did this on a smaller scale years ago, although I never managed to get the robot to cut the grass well. The sensing system I used worked well and didn't need the cable to be buried (although it could have been, very easily). At the time I'd been working on low frequency cave communications (low frequency RF goes through soil and rock to some extent).
The ground cable was a single core loop, fed with an AM modulated 100kHz signal. I used the mains frequency to modulate the 100kHz transmitter, which was just a simple crystal oscillator with a FET power stage. By applying AC to the power stage, overlaid on the power supply with a small transformer, I was able to get around 80% modulation depth.
The receiver on the mower was an old ferrite aerial, taken from a portable radio. I used the LW coil, tuned to 100kHz, and one of the cheap three pin ZN414 tuned radio frequency receiver chips. The output from this was fed to a comparator and then I just used a phase locked loop frequency detector to detect the modulation frequency.
In practice the receiver reliably detected the wire from around 200 to 300mm away, so I just arranged for it to be staked around the edge of flower beds etc.
The mower was the weak point. I got the vehicle to drive around randomly easily enough, using a simple control system (using another type of ucontroller) that used the RF sensor and two collision sensors (microswitches mounted to arms at the front either side). The algorithm was simple, just drive forward until a sensor was triggered, then reverse for a set time, turn through a set angle and move forward again. In practice this gave a pretty random movement that covered the whole lawn after a time.
The major failing was the cutter. I opted for a technique whereby the mower would run all the time. It had a solar panel for power, charging a sealed lead acid battery. The cutter was a rotating blade with a Stanley knife blade set in the end and was intended to just cut a few stray blades of grass at a time (it was designed to literally trim the grass as it grew, rather than wait until after it had grown a fair bit). I never managed to get enough traction from the wheels when the grass was wet and also never resolved the lack of power available at the cutter head.
I concluded that I needed a much bigger, more powerful unit, with a normal cutting strategy. After a whole summer of playing with it I gave up!
For more information, please visit Buried Cable Detection Systems.
Many construction and surveying jobs have a need for detection and location of underground utilities whether the task is simply to identify and avoid utilities in an excavation zone or produce maps for further works and design. Even though the same technology applies to more applications for detecting utilities, different equipment and accessories can assist a trained person to give the best quality information to the user and their skill set. (Read our blog on 4 key tools for utility detection to find out more)
Have access to the equipment needed
More than 70 per cent of utility strikes occur in the footpaths and highways, and the majority of these are LV electrical and telecoms cables. These statistics show during pre-excavation cables are often not identified by the excavation team. There can be several reasons why these strikes happen, however, having access to the equipment needed to locate these utilities that pose a risk to the workforce is essential. For avoidance of strikes in an identified dig zone, the most common tool is a cable avoidance tool.
Get trained on how to use a detection portfolio
Having specifications for a job should prepare the workers for what tools will be required, however, almost 90 per cent of strikes occur on planned works, showing that even having plans still does not eradicate damages to utilities. This could be due to outdated legacy maps or to incomplete equipment not being used with its accessories.
Hence, it is extremely important that whoever is working with a detection or locating instrument for underground utilities is trained on how to best use equipment and which device is most appropriate for each situation. For this reason, Leica Geosystems created the Leica Geosystems Detection Campus where you can get trained on the Leica Detection Portfolio.
Want more information on perimeter intrusion detection system? Feel free to contact us.
Have a site plan
Site plan information is only correct if it is recent so if it is weeks or months after a site plan was issued there is potential for more utilities to have been buried in the period leading up to the works. Therefore, scanning the site immediately before excavation is critical to prevent any strikes.
Have a full kit
Having a full kit for utility detection is essential. For example, using a cable avoidance tool in an excavation site would only locate passive signals, however, a transmitter adds the ability to apply a signal through direct connection or induction to locate signals that may not have been located in the passive search. Then, the additional use of accessories, such as signal clamps and tracing rods or sondes allow workers to overcome the majority of obstacles that could prevent the utility location. The signal clamps allow signals to be applied safely around a cable that is visible and potentially running through the site. The sonde and trace rods allow for effective location of non-conductive utilities, such as drainage or conduits, used for routing fibre optic cables.
Having the accessories at hand helps workers to be ready for any eventuality on site that might not have been documented in the plans, such as new scarring or utilities not marked on the maps provided.
In addition, to detect and avoid the plastic and non-metallic pipes or confirming excavation areas are clear of utilities, you should have at hand a GPR, like the Leica DSX. With this utility detection solution you ahve a more efficient, robust and easy-to-use GPR system to contractors and users by detecting utilities on site and easily checking data quality in real time. When the Leica DSX is used in conjunction with Leica Geosystems MC1 machine control software, the chances of utility damage are reduced.
For more RF970 Fiber Optic Perimeter Intrusion Detection Systemsinformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.