Bridge rectifier: functions circuits and applications

06 Aug.,2024

 

Bridge rectifier: functions circuits and applications

In electrical circuits, rectifiers are pivotal in converting alternating current (AC) to direct current (DC). These circuits are categorized into two main groups: single-phase and three-phase. Further distinctions are made within these groups, giving rise to uncontrolled, semi-controlled, and fully controlled rectifiers.

View Details

When utilizing diodes to execute the voltage conversion, it falls under the uncontrolled category. Conversely, power electronic components, such as SCRS (Silicon Controlled Rectifiers), transform it into a controlled rectifier. The type of rectification, whether half-wave or full-wave, hinges on the specific requirements of the application at hand.

Full-wave rectifier circuits commonly employ rectifier bridge stacks, which can be classified into two major types: full-bridge and half-bridge. A half-bridge is essentially a diode bridge rectifier with two halves combined. In contrast, a full-wave rectifier circuit can be created by one half-bridge alongside a transformer with a center tap. The entire bridge is crafted by interconnecting four rectifier diodes, effectively packaged as a single entity in the form of a bridge full-wave rectifier circuit.

These bridge rectifiers come in various shapes and configurations, including flat, round, square, bench-shaped (divided into in-line and SMD), GPP (Glass Passivated Package), and O/J structures. The rectifier&#;s current-carrying capacity spans from 0.5A to 100A, while the maximum reverse peak voltage ranges from 50V to V.

If you want to purchase a bridge rectifier or learn more about its configurations and applications, consider visiting an electronic store for various options and expert advice.

Understanding Bridge Rectifier Characteristics and Advantages

The forward current capabilities of the entire bridge span a range from 0.5A to higher values, incrementing in steps of 0.5A, such as 1A, 1.5A, 2A, and so forth, with more extensive options like 5A, 10A, 20A, 35A, and 50A available. These specifications cater to varying power requirements.

Correspondingly, the voltage withstands value, denoting the maximum reverse voltage the bridge can handle, is available in increasing levels, starting from 25V and progressing to 50V, 100V, 200V, and so on, with options like 300V, 400V, 500V, 600V, 800V, and even reaching V, addressing diverse voltage needs.

The primary distinction between a traditional rectifier and a bridge rectifier lies in the nearly doubled output voltage achieved by the bridge rectifier compared to a full-wave center tap transformer rectifier utilizing the same secondary voltage. A significant advantage of this bridge configuration is its independence from a center tap transformer. Each diode uses only half of the transformer&#;s secondary voltage in a center tap rectifier, resulting in a relatively modest DC output.

During the positive half-cycle of the power supply, diodes D1 and D2 work in series, while diodes D3 and D4 remain reverse-biased, permitting current flow through the load. Conversely, during the negative half-cycle of the power supply, diodes D3 and D4 conduct in series, while diodes D1 and D2 switch to the &#;OFF&#; state due to the reverse bias. This design ensures that the current flowing through the load maintains its original direction, facilitating consistent and efficient power delivery.

Functions

The bridge rectifier takes center stage in alternator power systems, wielding crucial functions that lay the foundation for efficient electrical operations. Its primary role is to convert the alternating current generated by the alternator into direct current, serving as a power source for electrical devices while simultaneously charging the battery. Beyond this, it acts as a guardian, preventing the battery&#;s reverse current from flowing back to the alternator and shielding it from the risks of burnout.

Goto Hornby Electronic to know more.

This remarkable functionality stems from the unidirectional conductive properties of silicon diodes. When a specific voltage is applied across both ends of the diode, with the positive power supply connected to the positive diode and the negative power supply to the negative diode, the diode activates, allowing current to flow.

Conversely, the diode remains inactive without this voltage, prohibiting current passage. Exploiting this intrinsic property, engineers have fashioned rectifiers, capitalizing on the diode&#;s ability to conduct current in only one direction. When an alternating current (AC) voltage encounters such a rectifier, only the positive half of the AC wave passes through, leaving the negative half impervious. As a result, pulsating direct current (DC) emerges at the rectifier&#;s opposing end.

The bridge rectifier circuit emerges as a refined solution, overcoming the limitations of the full-wave rectifier circuit. The latter necessitates a transformer with a central tap in the secondary and a diode capable of withstanding substantial reverse voltage. While the full-wave rectifier exhibits high efficiency due to its full utilization of the power transformer for both positive and negative half-cycles, it requires multiple diodes.

However, given the rapid advancements in semiconductor devices and their reduced costs today, this drawback needs to be more pronounced, paving the way for the broader practical application of the bridge rectifier circuit.

Comparing rectification efficiency, the full-wave rectifier takes the lead, boasting double the efficiency of its half-wave counterpart. The benefits continue as the output voltage, power surge, and a heightened transformer utilization factor contribute to overall efficiency.

Moreover, the full-wave rectifier&#;s lower ripple voltage and higher frequency alleviate the need for a center-tapped transformer in the secondary, rendering the transformer&#;s elimination possible when step-up or step-down voltage alterations aren&#;t required.

For a given power output, the bridge rectifier permits using a smaller power transformer, a significant advantage derived from the continuous flow of current through both the primary and secondary windings throughout the AC cycle. This optimized design streamlines energy conversion, facilitating more compact and efficient systems within bridge rectifiers.

Applications

Bridge rectifiers are indispensable components in electronics, serving as efficient agents in converting AC power to regulated DC power. These rectifiers, founded on diode-based systems, facilitate the crucial transformation by establishing a one-way current flow, effectively harnessing either half or the entirety of the AC signal. Whether in the form of a half-wave rectifier, addressing only a portion of the AC wave, or a full-wave rectifier, which rectifies both cycles of the AC signal, the bridge rectifier stands out for its adaptability.

Two standard configurations emerge in the full-wave rectifier category: the center tap rectifier and the bridge rectifier with four diodes. The center tap design, employing two diodes, delivers effective conversion, while the bridge rectifier capitalizes on the power of four diodes, expanding its capacity and versatility.

The bridge rectifier&#;s role as a reliable and multifaceted tool is essential, ensuring regulated DC power supplies in myriad electronic applications, thereby underpinning the optimal functionality of diverse systems.

OT: How to choose proper varistor to protect bridge rectifier

westom said:

Everything in that post remains unchallenged. Furthermore, mike_kilroy defined what should be obvious to everyone. Even an informed rookie technician does not change a design on speculation. First a problem is identified. Ie use a scope. Then a solution is implemented. Anyone fixing something only on wild speculation (ie varistors to stop failing diodes) wants to surrender his job to a Chinaman.

Never fix anything on wild speculation. Identify a reason for failure before fixing that failure. If volts were destroying the bridge, then that facility as a long list of other items simultaneously destroyed.

EDN magazine features &#;Tales from the Cube&#;. Stories of how people solved the strangest problems by simply doing what is said even in CSI. &#;Follow the evidence&#;.

Click to expand...

Technically, that is correct.....

In practice, experience shows that the design as described is GOING to have voltage spike problems.... If properly protected, it will NOT have overcurrent issues, and in any case a lot of blown fuses with no other faults would also be a factor. That has not been described.... Perhaps because it was not considered relevant, of course....but......

And, it does not sound as if the designers are going to look with a scope, nor that they even own one. If they DID, they would already have looked, seen the problem, and fixed it.

Putting a snubber on would be a routine necessity of sensible design..... and it SHOULD have been on there already. It should NOT be necessary to "prove" that a destructive spike will occur, unless the bean counters are asses.

Once the elementary protection is in place as it should have been already..... THEN we can talk about investigations that they likely will not do.

As for all the other office equipment that should also be destroyed....... this is DOCK EQUIPMENT AT A LAKE.... likely hundreds of feet from any such "office", and the spike problem is a LOCAL issue arising from the design.

Don't let the perfect world interfere with reality...... And I agree about the investigation..... but I ALREADY KNOW that there WILL be spikes if ther reverse relay is triggered while the motor is running. That CAN also lead to overcurrents, but where are the blown fuses with no cause? (I expect the fuse to blow after the bridge fails, that's not in question)

Technically, that is correct.....In practice, experience shows that the design as described is GOING to have voltage spike problems.... If properly protected, it will NOT have overcurrent issues, and in any case a lot of blown fuses with no other faults would also be a factor. That has not been described.... Perhaps because it was not considered relevant, of course....but......And, it does not sound as if the designers are going to look with a scope, nor that they even own one. If they DID, they would already have looked, seen the problem, and fixed it.Putting a snubber on would be a routine necessity of sensible design..... and it SHOULD have been on there already. It should NOT be necessary to "prove" that a destructive spike will occur, unless the bean counters are asses.Once the elementary protection is in place as it should have been already..... THEN we can talk about investigations that they likely will not do.As for all the other office equipment that should also be destroyed....... this is DOCK EQUIPMENT AT A LAKE.... likely hundreds of feet from any such "office", and the spike problem is a LOCAL issue arising from the design.Don't let the perfect world interfere with reality...... And I agree about the investigation..... but I ALREADY KNOW that there WILL be spikes if ther reverse relay is triggered while the motor is running. That CAN also lead to overcurrents, but where are the blown fuses with no cause? (I expect the fuse to blow after the bridge fails, that's not in question)

For more information, please visit China Bridge Rectifier Factory.